Wednesday, September 8, 2010

I am a name collector

I just posted a long comment on Elyse's genealogy blog in response to her post today Online Family Trees: A Genealogist’s Dream or Nightmare?

Elyse compared name collectors who have large online trees with relationships and facts that are not always verified with real genealogists who  search "vital, census, military, land, court, church, and every other record" to source the relationships and facts in their trees.

Here is what I said:

"I am a name collector....I use the names collected from online family trees, newspaper articles and websites such as Facebook as a means to find distant cousins.

Being armed with a name and date (especially for the Smiths and Browns) provides me with clues with which to search "vital, census, military, land, court, church, and every other record" I can find to verify the relationships of those names to my family.

I spent yesterday doing just that. As I added the names to my tree I concurrently searched Ancestry, FindMyPast, Australian Government BDM indexes, NSW State Archives,Familysearch,The Ryerson Index, Australian Cemetery Indexes,Trove and The Sydney Morning Herald Online to try to prove whether these people belonged in my tree.

By the end of the day I had identified one whole line of Brydon/Bryden descendants of my convict ancestor, Elizabeth Phipps. I uploaded this to my online family website http://www.geniaus.net so that other "name gatherers" might use what I have gathered as clues to solve their genealogical jigsaws.

For me genealogy/family history is not a serious academic pursuit but a hobby/passion/obsession about which I am very serious. By posting names for which I don't have evidentiary documentation  of relationships/existence on my website I have made worthwhile connections and entered into dialogue with cousins from all over. Some of these people have generously shared photos and documents relating to the names I have posted thus making the presence of those names in my tree legitimate.

Name gathering can be a means to an end for genealogists.

5 comments:

Judy Webster said...

My partial family tree includes some people for whom I am seeking evidence for or against a connection. I also 'put out feelers' on CuriousFox in the hope that someone will set me straight if I am on the wrong track.

Brenda said...

Me too! And in a similar fashion I have made contacts with relatively close cousins via the unverified twigs on my tree!

Judy Webster said...

Continuing the discussion... After reading Dick Eastman's article about unverified data, I commented that "I err on the side of caution and record 'too many people'. Those who initially seem unrelated may later prove to be relevant. I record sources (ideally three independent sources) for every fact, but I do not always list those sources on the Internet. When I uploaded a GEDCOM to Rootsweb's WorldConnect and other sites, the sources did not always come across in a format that made sense. Consequently I often publish data online without citing sources, but I make a statement such as - This is a work in progress and some details will be wrong. Additions and corrections are welcome. I have detailed source references, which I will share with anyone willing to exchange information about these families."

Vanessa said...

This is a fascinating post. As someone who has recently decided to compile a family tree, you are an amazing resource full of ideas (that I now just need the time to implement!) Thank you!

Geniaus said...

Thanks for the compliment, Vanessa. Have fun putting the leaves on your family tree.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...